Sunday, February 7, 2010

My Feminist Christmas

I had a very unusual Christmas Eve last year. Most families in the neighborhood were spending quality time together or were busy wrapping last-minute presents, but not my family. No, the Antaya family was engrossed in a tense feminist debate starting around six o’clock in the evening, when my aunt boldly declared, “it’s all men’s fault!”, until about nine o’clock, when I could be found apologizing to the four women in my house, my dad having taken the opportunity to escape long before. The debate was heated and rather circular, but a topic came up that I find relevant to our current discussion: namely gender as a self-generating cycle.

My aunt’s accusatory, and I would argue rather unfair, statement was made while she was flipping through the channels and came upon Mariah Carey performing in an outfit (if you can even call it that) which was quite revealing. Surprised and a bit offended, I asked my aunt to explain what she meant by that sweeping generalization. She told me that Mariah only dressed that way because the male dominated society made it so that she could not be a pop star if she dressed otherwise. In response, I pointed out, as most men would, that the vast majority of people in the audience were women, as were most of the consumers who bought her albums. In a business that often attracts fans more through visual displays than through original or quality music, it seemed to me that Mariah must have had her female fans in mind when she choose her outfit. Indeed, I asked, there are millions upon millions of women who aspire to “Hollywood” bodies and praise those who have achieved them, so how can this ideal be blamed entirely on men?

At the time, that seemed like full-proof reasoning. After reading Butler’s argument for gender as a self-perpetuating form of psychological oppression, however, I have come to realize that there really is no clear-cut answer to my aunt’s challenge. I think that my aunt’s claim was an oversimplification of a complex issue, but so was my response. I was right to argue that women do play a part in the continuation of the “Hollywood” body ideal, but I was wrong to not see that this perpetuation exists because our society tells each young woman that the body she is born with is less “feminine”, indeed less natural, than the airbrushed one she sees in magazines. When you believe, as our society continually indoctrinates, that having the gender “woman” is a natural classification and that a body like most female pop stars have is the most feminine, how can you avoid feeling that your body is somehow unnatural?

5 comments:

  1. Nice post, Colin, I loved your opening story about your family.

    As I expressed in my post about feminist lyrics, I agree with you that men are the not the core for the problem of sexism in pop culture. Men might watch such performances by Mariah Carey but women are the ones who actually bring such oppression into society. If actresses or female singers were over weight and not considerate of the current fashion trends, I don't think that any females would watch such actresses or singers, as they would not be representing the feminine ideal that society expects a woman to uphold. Therefore, it might be men's fault on a much smaller scale than it is women's fault for promoting such feminine images.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Colin, I think you're right in pointing out these things. But what about performers such as Susan Boyle? This 60-something-year-old woman obviously does not fit the "Hollywood" beauty ideal. Yet, she sold over 3 million records last year, less than Taylor Swift (someone who fulfills that beauty stereotype without having to be "too sexy"), but more than Lady Gaga (someone whose sex appeal undoubtedly contributes to her success). I'd be interested to see how you respond to this anomaly in an otherwise seemingly image-obsessed society.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I want to talk about your last comment. Couldn't someone say that the body image problem you find sexist works both ways. Most of the action stars and athletes do not have a normal body either. Most of them look like they believe steriods are one of the basic food groups. Take Sean Connery for example, he was the greatest bond ever, however someone like him definately could not be hired as bond today because of the way he looked. He didn't look like he spent every hour in the gym like our current Bond does. I think hollywood creates a standard that most people won't achieve, they create a perfectionist idea of the body,that is it. If it is opressive, I would have to say it works both ways.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for the great comment Lindsey.

    Regarding Susan Boyle, I don't see her as a true departure from our image-obsessed society. In fact, I think that her image has played a huge part in her fame, albeit in a way that is exactly opposite to the norm. Susan Boyle has a beautiful voice, but she is famous largely because people were shocked to see that talent and sex appeal in popular music can actually be mutually exclusive. Call me cynical, but I can't help but feel that many people are fans of hers because they get to say, "look at me not judging a book by it's cover."

    And don't even get me started on Lady Gaga...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Jared,

    I want to agree with you man - I'm definitely made aware by Hollywood of my less than bodybuilder physique - but I don't think that I can. One only has to consider a show like "King of Queens" to realize that popular culture does not put nearly the same pressure on men to maintain their appearance as it does on women. It is true that men in the role of action stars or athletes are expected to have great physiques, but there is nothing unusual with an obese man running a fortune 500 company. The difference is that for most men, their appearance (beyond basic hygiene) and their professional lives are completely divorced. For women, however, the two are often inextricably linked.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.